Regarding Project "Migrate FLOE and Fluid project websites to a Modern Static Site Generator"

[Gregor Moss]

Hi Shoaib,

The number of pull requests is not, on its own, a criterion for selection. We will make our choices based on a number of factors, but the most important will be the quality and relevance of the proposal.

Cheers,
Gregor

From: Shoaib Ahmed <17bcs052 at smvdu.ac.in>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 13:02
To: Gregor Moss <gmoss at ocadu.ca>
Subject: Re: Regarding Project "Migrate FLOE and Fluid project websites to a Modern Static Site Generator"

Thanks Gregor. I also wanted to ask, is the number of PR of Github account a selection criteria?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:27 PM Gregor Moss <gmoss at ocadu.ca<mailto:gmoss at ocadu.ca>> wrote:
Hi Shoaib,

We don’t require the use of a particular Static Site Generator for this project, though initially we chose Hugo since we use it on a couple of other sites in our organization. You should detail why you have made your selection in your proposal, and this can include the research you have done. I hope this helps.

Cheers,
Gregor

From: fluid-work <fluid-work-bounces at lists.idrc.ocad.ca<mailto:fluid-work-bounces at lists.idrc.ocad.ca>> On Behalf Of Shoaib Ahmed
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 12:53
To: fluid-work at lists.idrc.ocad.ca<mailto:fluid-work at lists.idrc.ocad.ca>
Subject: Regarding Project "Migrate FLOE and Fluid project websites to a Modern Static Site Generator"

Hi, I am another student hoping to join the organization for this project. Before working on Proposal Draft I thought I should ask if any SSG is selected for the migration. I spent a few hours researching over them and everyone has some advantage or disadvantage over each other.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20200316/4bfe60f1/attachment.html>