Regarding the steps forward

Justin Obara obara.justin at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 12:23:46 UTC 2020


Hi Ayush,

Thank you for your interest.

You will only be able to work on at most one GSoC project. However, as these are all open source projects, you are welcome to contribute to projects outside of the framework of GSoC. 

If you are interested in both projects I’d recommend that you write up proposals for both. 

Thanks
Justin

> On Mar 14, 2020, at 10:10 AM, Ayush Shankar <ayushshanker23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> As the project:"Migrate FLOE and Fluid Project websites to a Modern Static Site Generator",
> requires migrating it to a static site generator,so my first choice personally was Hugo.
> But my personal choice should not dominate the organization's welfare.
> So I would like to know your opinion about the choice of the static site generator to be used.
> Today I was reading a comparison article between Hugo and Jekyll 
> (Reference:https://stackshare.io/stackups/hugo-vs-jekyll <https://stackshare.io/stackups/hugo-vs-jekyll>) and found out that though more used and forked preference is Jekyll but the faster and more efficient one is Hugo.
> So yes genuinely,I still believe Hugo is a better option but I would like to know your opinion.(Or if you prefer any third static site generator?)
> Moreover I have another question.
> Can I work on two projects simultaneously during the Gsoc period as I find the project:"Port UIO+ Chrome Extension to Firefox and Safari;add more adaptations",
> quite interesting .
> But for this project I can only work on the Firefox Extension because I do not possess a macOS machine.
> Honestly I want to work on both the projects with "Migrate FLOE and Fluid Project websites to a Modern Static Site Generator",
> as the primary project and half of the the UIO+ Extension project(i.e.only the Firefox Extension) as the second project during the GSoc Project.
> I do not know whether it is correct according to Google's rules to work with two projects simultaneously or not.
> So just wanted to confirm about it.
> Hope you find both of my questions in this mail with the best of your health.
> Thanks in advance,
> Ayush
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at lists.idrc.ocad.ca
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20200316/ae4d523b/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list