Which CMS to use for new site?

Michelle D'Souza michelled33 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 15 14:02:14 UTC 2019


Hi Gregor,

Thanks for outlining the requirements and options. 

My feeling with NetlifyCMS is that it hasn’t matured to a point where a non-technical user can use it well. Perhaps Dana has more insight into this as she’s been using it for the SJRK site.

Michelle



> On Aug 15, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Hung, Jonathan <jhung at ocadu.ca> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gregor,
>  
> There’s a good chance the new IDRC site will run on its given platform for much longer than anticipated. If support for Netlify discontinues, how does that impact our ability to either maintain, develop, migrate the site?
>  
> Can Netlify handle different user permissions and workflows based on user roles (i.e. Editors, Authors, Administrators)? For example, someone with a “Community Contributor” role may have a different authorship workflow than someone with an “Editor” role. 
>  
> -Jon.
>  
> From: fluid-work <fluid-work-bounces at lists.idrc.ocad.ca> On Behalf Of Moss, Gregor
> Sent: August 14, 2019 4:31 PM
> To: Fluid Work <fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
> Subject: Which CMS to use for new site?
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> We’re getting started on designs and planning the work for a couple of new sites here at the IDRC (the IDRC site https://idrc.ocadu.ca/ <https://idrc.ocadu.ca/> and a redesign of the ILDH https://handbook.floeproject.org/ <https://handbook.floeproject.org/>), and we’d love to get some feedback from you on which content management system you think would be best. Content on these sites won’t be changing too often, about once every month or two.
>  
> Some minimum requirements in no particular order:
> Content searching either built in or easily added and maintained
> Tagging and/or other metadata capabilities
> Ease of contribution for non-developers
> Potential for contributions from outside users (much like the Fluid Wiki and Jira)
> Free (as in beer), and ideally FOSS
> Fully customizable in terms of markup and styling on a page-by-page basis
> Minimal intervention from an infrastructure perspective
>  
> We’ve been looking primarily at WordPress (https://wordpress.org/ <https://wordpress.org/>) and Netlify CMS (https://www.netlifycms.org/ <https://www.netlifycms.org/>).
>  
> My questions to each of you:
> Do you have any arguments for or against either of these two options?
> Do you have any other CMS’s you would recommend checking out?
> Do you have any other advice?
>  
> Personally, I’m partial to Netlify CMS due to its seemingly lightweight setup, performance and the potential for integrating Infusion if we would like any features from there. It runs on the JAMstack, which means that server responses will be much quicker (among other benefits). On the other hand, Netlify is pretty fresh and finding support, plugins or articles on SO won’t be as easy while WordPress has been around for over 15 years and has a fairly healthy support community.
>  
> Cheers and thanks,
> Gregor
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at lists.idrc.ocad.ca
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20190815/21b8caf7/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list