fluid-work Digest, Vol 102, Issue 4

Maria Carmen C. Cruz cruzinmc at gmail.com
Sun Aug 16 00:15:18 EDT 2015


Hi Murilo, I think Sketches 4.1 and 4.3 are the best.  They both give
the exact percentage and are easy to understand.  I like Sketch 4.3
because it only has the percentage unit markers and I'm a plain-Jane
who doesn't usually like having extraneous stuff.  But I also like 4.1
because that flute sound representing the market share might help some
people too.

I picked 4.1 over 4.2 because it may be harder for some people to hear
you speaking over the continuous flute sound of 4.2, where in 4.1
you're not talking over any other sound.  It may also help some people
to have the flute sound broken up into the different market sections
like you have in 4.1.

My only suggestion is that maybe you could space the 10-unit markers
just a little closer together.  Maybe it's just me, but with the
10-unit markers further apart I feel like I'm waiting a long time to
hear the next one.  I like the spacing of the one-unit markers though.

I hope this helps, and I hope I'm posting my feedback in the right
place.  Thanks, and take care.
-- 
María Carmen C. Cruz
Blog: http://cruzviewz.blogspot.com.
Facebook: www.facebook.com/CruzingMC.
Twitter: @CruzingMC.
Maria Cruz Designs: www.cyberwavedesign.com.
My favorite charities: donate online at
https://www.canadahelps.org/GivingPages/GivingPage.aspx?gpID=35700.
My custom manual wheelchair fund: www.gofundme.com/manual-chair-fund.

On 8/13/15, fluid-work-request at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca
<fluid-work-request at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca> wrote:
> Send fluid-work mailing list submissions to
> 	fluid-work at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	fluid-work-request at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fluid-work-owner at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fluid-work digest..."


More information about the fluid-work mailing list