Directory restructuring on hold
obara.justin at gmail.com
Thu May 29 08:49:01 EDT 2014
Thanks for the feedback Anastasia.
In the discussion at the meeting yesterday, it came up that lib didn't seem to fit into the src directory either because it isn't code that was written by us. In regards to the destruction of the integration demos, I had tried to do that for the 1.5 release. However, it seems that this is a unique use case that we need to keep for the pager. Perhaps it could be moved to the manual tests though.
Anastasia, could you describe a bit the differences and the purposes of each type of demo (showcase, instructional, standalone).
On May 29, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia <acheetham at ocadu.ca> wrote:
> On 2014-05-28, at 3:48 PM, Justin Obara wrote:
> questions arose regarding how best to organize the various demos. Currently we have demos, instructional-demos, integration-demos, stand-alone demos, and manual tests. It's hard to know the difference between these.
> Good questions, Justin. I looked back though past emails and discussions and found this email:
> Basically, the proposal was:
> integration <- to be destroyed
> For the demos/instructional folder, the hierarchy would mirror, as much as reasonable, the hierarchy of the source folder. In general:
> Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre
> acheetham at ocadu.ca<mailto:acheetham at ocadu.ca> Inclusive Design Institute
> OCAD University
More information about the fluid-work