Directory restructuring on hold

Cheetham, Anastasia acheetham at ocadu.ca
Thu May 29 08:41:42 EDT 2014


On 2014-05-28, at 3:48 PM, Justin Obara wrote:

 questions arose regarding how best to organize the various demos. Currently we have demos, instructional-demos, integration-demos, stand-alone demos, and manual tests. It's hard to know the difference between these.

Good questions, Justin. I looked back though past emails and discussions and found this email:

http://fluid.2324889.n4.nabble.com/Proposed-folder-hierarchy-for-Infusion-code-td8919.html

Basically, the proposal was:

src
   framework
   components
   lib
   module
demos
   showcase
   instructional
   integration <- to be destroyed
   standalone
tests


For the demos/instructional folder, the hierarchy would mirror, as much as reasonable, the hierarchy of the source folder. In general:

demos/instructional
   framework
           core
           prefs
           renderer
   components
       componentX
           shared
               css
                   shared.css
               html
                   shared.html
               js
                   shared.js
           demoX
               css
                   file.css
               html
                   file.html
               js
                   file.js
           demoY
               css
                   file.css
               html
                   file.html
               js
                   file.js
       componentY
       etc



--
Anastasia Cheetham     Inclusive Design Research Centre
acheetham at ocadu.ca<mailto:acheetham at ocadu.ca>           Inclusive Design Institute
                                        OCAD University

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20140529/985e89f3/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list