UIO Strategy meeting recap

Justin Obara obara.justin at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 13:07:19 UTC 2013

Thanks for writing this up. It looks good, there is just one additional bit. In the case of the UIO + Page Enhancer for the starter set, we would likely have a single grade. This grade would have been the union of the "fluid.uiOpitons.starterSettingsPanels", "fluid.uiEnhancer.starterEnactors", and "fluid.uiOptions.starterSettingsSchema" grades. This is to make it a bit easier for an integrator to just get started.


On 2013-06-11, at 3:43 PM, "Cheetham, Anastasia" <acheetham at ocadu.ca> wrote:

> I've reworked the wiki proposal page presenting a new UIO API to reflect our latest discussions:
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Proposal+-+New+UIO+API
> Please have a look. For those who've been involved in the discussions, if I've misunderstood anything, please let me know. Everyone, please give some thought to whether or not this seems reasonable to ask of integrators.
> In particular, in the section titled "Use Case: 3rd Parties Wanting A Subset Of The Starter Set," two alternative options are presented. I'm interested to hear thoughts on which of these alternatives seems preferable. We will support both, but I'm wondering which one we should recommend.
> -- 
> Anastasia Cheetham     Inclusive Design Research Centre
> acheetham at ocadu.ca           Inclusive Design Institute
>                                        OCAD University
> <winmail.dat>

More information about the fluid-work mailing list