Integration Demos

Justin Obara obara.justin at gmail.com
Mon Jul 29 08:42:48 EDT 2013


Thanks Michelle for bringing this up, my comments on are inline below.

Thanks
Justin
On 2013-07-26, at 2:41 PM, Michelle D'Souza <michelled33 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I was doing some testing and noticed that we once again have some broken integration demos in the project repository master. I'm wondering if we want to fix them or if we want to remove them. 
> 
> Demo of what UIO looks like in an old version of Sakai:
> http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/integration-demos/sakai/html/ui-options-fss-sakai.html
> My preference is to remove this, since we have UIO integrated in several production spaces at this point, and this demo doesn't show anything different for the real world cases.

+1

> 
> Demo of Pager in an old version of Sakai:
> http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/integration-demos/sakai/html/pager-site-setting.html
> My preference is to remove this since the Pager demo shows basically the same use case.

+1

> 
> Manual test of Progress:
> http://build.fluidproject.org/infusion/tests/manual-tests/html/simple-progress.html
> I think we should fix this one since it shows more than our demo does.

Would it be possible to convert this manual tests into expand coverage in our unit tests?

> 
> Please chime in if you have an opinion.
> 
> Michelle
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Michelle D'Souza
> Senior Inclusive Developer
> Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD University
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work



More information about the fluid-work mailing list