more thinking circles - pdf version

[Vass, Joanna]

Hi all,

Attached is the latest Cloud for All diagram elaborating on the interaction using the PCP. I think there's a lot in it that can be simplified and thought more through, but your feedback is welcomed!

Thanks,
Joanna







On 2013-01-23, at 7:25 PM, Dana Ayotte wrote:

Here is the pdf version of the latest page.

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Dana Ayotte <dana.ayotte at gmail.com<mailto:dana.ayotte at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Please see Page 5 for our latest omnigraffle diagram.  Joanna and I worked through the decision tree for a personal device (phone), and started to work through the kiosk flow but this section is very bare bones.  The phone tree also needs more thinking through and tweaking but we welcome any feedback you may have!
Thanks,
Dana

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Vass, Joanna <jvass at ocadu.ca<mailto:jvass at ocadu.ca>> wrote:

Hi all,
Today, Dana and I continued mapping out and thinking through the various Cloud for All tools and interaction. Attached is the omnigraffle file. Page 4 is the latest diagram with some questions that came up on the bottom. So far the diagram is focused around Preference Set creation using the Preference Management Tool versus the Personal Control Panel. I think the visualization of this will evolve as we add more pieces.

Thanks,
Joanna


On 2013-01-15, at 5:33 PM, Vass, Joanna wrote:


Hi all,
Attached is the continuation of our messy mind map of the interaction between the Cloud for All tools. The second screen is attempting to visualize the context the different tools may be used in, but this might not be the right form to accurately capture the variety use cases. And the most recent, the third screen is starting to explore possible workflows.

Thanks,
Joanna

On 2013-01-15, at 11:39 AM, Jess Mitchell wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> The attached is a very very messy OmniGraffle that begins our attempt to sort out a number of axes no fewer than
> - in the cloud versus offline
> - preferences the user wants to persist versus those that are more ephemeral
> - and something related to quickness and usability -- in other words, why would someone choose one tool to change prefs over another and also why would someone choose to persist a change versus let it be session-specific.
>
> It is a very very messy start, but this is how we are sorting out our thinking of UIO in the context of Cloud4All.
>
> I'm attaching the original OmniGraffle for those who want to edit and also a PDF for those who just want a peek at the mess.
>
> Best,
> Jess
>
>
> <c4a_thinkingcircles.graffle><c4a_thinkingcircles.pdf>

<c4a_thinkingcircles2.pdf><c4a_thinkingcircles2.graffle>_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org<mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work



<c4a_thinkingcircles5.pdf>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20130124/651aea66/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: c4a_thinkingcircles6.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 106744 bytes
Desc: c4a_thinkingcircles6.pdf
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20130124/651aea66/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: c4a_thinkingcircles6.graffle
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 498280 bytes
Desc: c4a_thinkingcircles6.graffle
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20130124/651aea66/attachment.obj>