The use of "decorator" in the video player

Li, Cindy cli at
Tue Jan 3 19:11:36 UTC 2012

Thanks for the quick response, Charly.

I see you point. I will give a try on sub-components.


On 2012-01-03, at 1:52 PM, charly molter wrote:

I think I used the decorator in order to have a more modular thing easy to remove bits.
I thought that was easier. Maybe I got it wrong. If you see another way of doing it it might be right too.
It was written in subcomponents in the beginning I think. But I was having issue with the templating. I couldn't just remove something from the html and not instanciate the depending components.

I don't know if I'm clear enough about that.

Best regards

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Li, Cindy <cli at<mailto:cli at>> wrote:
In case any of you is interested in this topic.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Cindy Qi Li <cli at<mailto:cli at>>
Subject: The use of "decorator" in the video player
Date: 3 January, 2012 11:59:09 AM EST
To: charly molter <charly.molter at<mailto:charly.molter at>>
Cc: Michelle D'Souza <mdsouza at<mailto:mdsouza at>>, Anastasia Cheetham <acheetham at<mailto:acheetham at>>

Hi Charly,

Hope you had a great holiday.

As you know that we are working on a bunch of jiras to polish up your video player code (

The issue 4545 ( is that in your video player scripts, there're a few places using decorators rather than sub-components. For instance,

We wonder if there were reasons or difficulties that stopped you from using sub-components and had to go with decorators?


fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at<mailto:fluid-work at>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,

Charly Molter

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the fluid-work mailing list