The use of "decorator" in the video player

charly molter charly.molter at
Tue Jan 3 18:52:33 UTC 2012

I think I used the decorator in order to have a more modular thing easy to
remove bits.
I thought that was easier. Maybe I got it wrong. If you see another way of
doing it it might be right too.
It was written in subcomponents in the beginning I think. But I was having
issue with the templating. I couldn't just remove something from the html
and not instanciate the depending components.

I don't know if I'm clear enough about that.

Best regards

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Li, Cindy <cli at> wrote:

>  In case any of you is interested in this topic.
> Begin forwarded message:
>  *From: *Cindy Qi Li <cli at>
>  *Subject: **The use of "decorator" in the video player*
>  *Date: *3 January, 2012 11:59:09 AM EST
>  *To: *charly molter <charly.molter at>
>  *Cc: *Michelle D'Souza <mdsouza at>, Anastasia Cheetham <
> acheetham at>
> Hi Charly,
> Hope you had a great holiday.
> As you know that we are working on a bunch of jiras to polish up your
> video player code (
> The issue 4545 ( is that
> in your video player scripts, there're a few places using decorators rather
> than sub-components. For instance,
> We wonder if there were reasons or difficulties that stopped you from
> using sub-components and had to go with decorators?
> Cindy
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see

Charly Molter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the fluid-work mailing list