4461 - Problem with px -> em conversion

Li, Cindy cli at ocad.ca
Thu Sep 22 15:29:32 UTC 2011


Hi,

I'm looking into FLUID-4461, which is UIEnhancer unit tests fail in IE9 because the line spacing size returns 1.51 rather than expected 1.5.

The problem is resulted from our recently-introduced px to em conversion on "font-size". Since retrieving "font-size" value via jQuery returns in px but we all agreed that it's better to set font size in "em", a new UIEnhancer option "px2emFactor" with default value "16" is introduced to convert jQuery returned px value into em before it's applied by UIO. However, the next time this UIO-set em value being retrieve by jQuery from browser, it is converted back to px. Seems the browser uses a different factor value which creates the issue.

For instance, the value returned by first query on "font-size" via jQuery is "10px", UIO converts and sets "0.625em" onto main page. The next retrieval via jQuery on "font-size" returns "9.93px" instead.

I had a peek into jQuery code on how it gets font size value, seems it uses browser supported function getComputedStyle() or property currentStyle. With IE, getComputedStyle() is supported since IE9. The older IE version uses currentStyle. In other words, the em to px conversion and the factor being used is determined by the browser rather than a jQuery behaviour.

https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/webapp/lib/jquery/core/js/jquery.js#L6541
https://github.com/fluid-project/infusion/blob/master/src/webapp/lib/jquery/core/js/jquery.js#L6487-6504

Another interesting thing I noticed with IE9 is, if I turned on "compatible view", which is an IE9 feature saying "to make the websites designed for older browsers look better and problems such as out-of-place menus, images or text will be corrected", getComputedStyle() would return the expected "10px" and UIEnhancer unit test would pass. This gives me an impression that the regular IE9 deals with css a bit differently from its older siblings.

Any idea of the solution to this issue?

Thanks.

Cindy


More information about the fluid-work mailing list