Naming convention for wiki/svn/etc...

Leah Maestri leahm at
Wed Jan 6 18:36:03 UTC 2010

Good point, Jess.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jess Mitchell" <jess at>
To: "Leah Maestri" <leahm at>
Cc: "fluid-work" <fluid-work at>, "james" <james.yoon at>, "Victoria Moulder" <victoria_moulder at>
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2010 10:31:53 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: Naming convention for wiki/svn/etc...

do we need the FE?

otherwise +1


Jess Mitchell
Boston, MA, USA
Project Manager / Fluid Project
jess at
/ w / 617.326.7753  / c / 919.599.5378
jabber: jessmitchell at

On Jan 6, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Leah Maestri wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm resurrecting this in light of a recent re-org to the wiki we did. The last discussion centered around the following naming convention:
> Date(MM-DD-YY)_project name abbreviation_ type of work description_title_author(s) abbreviated_version number.
> So as an example:
> 10-21-09_FE_wireframe-sketches_kiosk-v4_JM-VM_1.jpg
> 10-21-09_FE_wireframe-sketches_kiosk-v4_JM-VM_2.jpg
> 10-21-09_FE_wireframe-sketches_kiosk-v4_JM-VM_3.jpg
> etc...
> I know people thought it was redundant to have the date stamped in the title, but for the wiki this is actually helpful as we need to do "versioning" somewhat manually and it's helpful to know what docs were created at different times.
> Feedback?
> Best,
> Lee

More information about the fluid-work mailing list