Naming convention for wiki/svn/etc...

Jess Mitchell jess at jessmitchell.com
Wed Jan 6 18:31:53 UTC 2010


do we need the FE?

otherwise +1

Jess

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jess Mitchell
Boston, MA, USA
Project Manager / Fluid Project
jess at jessmitchell.com
/ w / 617.326.7753  / c / 919.599.5378
jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com
http://www.fluidproject.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




On Jan 6, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Leah Maestri wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm resurrecting this in light of a recent re-org to the wiki we did. The last discussion centered around the following naming convention:
> 
> Date(MM-DD-YY)_project name abbreviation_ type of work description_title_author(s) abbreviated_version number.
> 
> So as an example:
> 
> 10-21-09_FE_wireframe-sketches_kiosk-v4_JM-VM_1.jpg
> 10-21-09_FE_wireframe-sketches_kiosk-v4_JM-VM_2.jpg
> 10-21-09_FE_wireframe-sketches_kiosk-v4_JM-VM_3.jpg
> 
> etc...
> 
> I know people thought it was redundant to have the date stamped in the title, but for the wiki this is actually helpful as we need to do "versioning" somewhat manually and it's helpful to know what docs were created at different times.
> 
> Feedback?
> 
> Best,
> Lee




More information about the fluid-work mailing list