Commenting "unsupported" functions (as well as supported functions)

Justin Obara obara.justin at
Mon Dec 13 16:01:01 UTC 2010

Looked through progress, I don't think there is anything there that needs to be marked as unsupported. I'll take a look a reorderer since harris isn't here.

On 2010-12-13, at 10:32 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia wrote:

> One of the remaining tasks before release is to identify any "public" functions/methods/instance variables/options that we don't actually want users to use, and comment to that effect in the code:
> I have some sense of different areas of the code in which these comments are needed, and I'll be pinging people about it once I've had a quick look over the code. Likely suspects:
>  Antranig: framework changes
>  Mike: Inline Edit (this isn't actually for 'unsupported' things, but descriptions of newly public functions that are supported)
>  Justin: Progress
>  Colin/Mike: Uploader
>  Harris: Reorderer
> There may be more, I'll know once I check the code.
> -- 
> Anastasia Cheetham     Inclusive Design Research Centre
> acheetham at            Inclusive Design Institute
>                                        OCAD University
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see

More information about the fluid-work mailing list