Engage directory structure

Yura Zenevich yura.zenevich at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 21:29:16 UTC 2009

I was just wondering what kettle directory would mean inside this structure.
Would it include all kettle server infrastructure and all the javascript
apps, or these two would be defined somehow separately?



On Sep 22, 2009 5:22 PM, "Colin Clark" <colinbdclark at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Michelle and everyone else,

On 21-Sep-09, at 3:44 PM, Michelle D'Souza wrote:

 Hi everyone,
> As we approach the 0.1 release of Engage we need to decide on the directory
> structure of the engage trunk. Here is a suggestion which is based on the
> Infusion structure. Please comment and suggest alternatives. One question I
> have - should there be a services directory? What would go in there?
> fluid
>        engage
>                trunk
>                        src
>                                webapp
>                                        components
>                                        demos
>                                        kettle
>                                        lib
>                                        tests

How does this sit with the standard directory structure expected by Maven 2?

I'd love to hear from Antranig and Yura about this proposed directory
structure and if it will suit our needs.

In the end, our goal is to make building Engage as simple as possible. Since
it's currently based on Kettle's JVM-based approach, Maven is probably the
way this will be built. If we need to add an Ant script for other
build-related tasks, we can look at that, too.


Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090922/10853f6f/attachment.htm>

More information about the fluid-work mailing list