website work

[Laurel A. Williams]

Hi Jess,

I agree with you that it is a long term task. However, my biggest 
concern in terms of a code review would be for people to look a the use 
of the infusion components on the site. As I still feel like I'm a 
newbie at this stuff, and given the problems everyone had with the 
builder yesterday, seems to me that it would be smart to review my 
implementations of the UI Options page. I can't point to anything else 
right off the top of my head, but I suspect there are other issues 
related to the use of infusion that could be reviewed.

Laurel

Jess Mitchell wrote:
> This is on the list Laurel -- I'm well aware of it.  It's likely 
> something we'll achieve in stages.  I think that the work we're 
> gearing up for in anticipation of MCN plus integrating the new 
> features from the Infusion release will get us there somewhat.  
> Unfortunately, I don't think this task will get done all at once.  
> Thanks for bringing it back up again.
>
> Jess
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Laurel A. Williams wrote:
>
>> Hi Colin,
>>
>> Along with upgrading the production site, and the builder 
>> modifications, this might be a good time for someone (not me) to 
>> tackle a code review of the website: 
>> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-2628.
>> We added that task when we completed the site re-design, so it is 
>> long overdue.
>>
>> Laurel
>>
>> <laurel_williams.vcf>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: laurel_williams.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 269 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20091014/b2263e83/attachment.vcf>