Everyone's input needed: voting and feedback on Fluid Engage logos (again!)
erin.yu at utoronto.ca
Fri Nov 27 21:42:36 UTC 2009
I just voted.
Minor feedback on the f design: it is a bit hard to read and I think
it might help if the dots directly around the e were a bit smaller. I
really like it though.
On 27-Nov-09, at 4:27 PM, James William Yoon wrote:
> Justin just brought up a great question, which was,
> "What if my ranking of the full logo (left logos) would be different
> than the compact logo (right logos)?"
> Since we'd be using the full logo more frequently than the compact
> logo, place more weight on the full logo (left logos) when making
> your decision.
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:08 PM, James William Yoon <james.yoon at utoronto.ca
> > wrote:
> Dear Fluid community,
> We've come up with three more good logo candidates (one of them a
> revision of a logo from the first round). They're up on this page
> We'd like you to take a look at the logos, and **RANK THEM ACCORDING
> TO YOUR PREFERENCE**.
> A good idea to make a well-informed decision would be to check out
> the copy Jess wrote for http://www.fluidengage.org as a reference
> point for what Fluid Engage is all about.
> Please use this thread to provide open feedback and share whether
> you felt compelled by one in particular over the others, or whether
> you felt more or less the same about all three. Let us know what you
> liked and didn't like!
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the fluid-work