Prepping Mobile Wireframes for User Testing

tona monjo tonamonjo at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 14:36:42 UTC 2009


Great, thanks!

Tona

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:34 PM, James William Yoon
<james.yoon at utoronto.ca>wrote:

> We did in fact--Erin prepared a picture of a sleigh and label including
> standard tombstone information as well as the object code. Erin, could you
> put these up on the wiki for Tona?
>
> James
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> James, preparing the documentation for tomorrow's test, I wonder if you
>> have used any picture of artifact with label and object code. If you
>> haven't, I will prepare one.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tona
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Alistair,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your interest! I'm going to do two user testing tomorrow (at
>> our 3PM), and I'm printing today the wireframes to prepare it. I think they
>> are complete, but if I detect anything or do some change, I'll tell you.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Tona
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alistair Jones <ajonesolt at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Tona,
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure when you will be doing your user testing (perhaps you
>> >> have started already?)  I was wondering if you needed anything else in
>> >> the User Ready wireframes.  Let me know if I can do anything to help!
>> >> See you tonight in the design meeting
>> >>
>> >> Alistair
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Alistair,
>> >> >
>> >> > It would be interesting if you could also work on the
>> >> > FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for the
>> user
>> >> > testing.
>> >> >
>> >> > We should also have a new version for FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle
>> and
>> >> > FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work on it
>> after
>> >> > creating the 3 new artifact pages.
>> >> >
>> >> > About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version
>> currently at
>> >> > the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly).
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks!!
>> >> >
>> >> > Tona
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Alistair,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the wireframes,
>> and
>> >> >> they really look much better with actual contents.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I send you some comments below (in red):
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <
>> ajonesolt at gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hi James and Tona and all,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the Lorem
>> Ipsum
>> >> >>> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design.  Since I
>> was
>> >> >>> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases to be
>> >> >>> safe, so you should see everything there.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new ones are
>> >> >> corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says "icon"
>> in
>> >> >>> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc.  Do we have
>> >> >>> icons for those some where?  Should I try to come up with
>> something?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good idea
>> if you
>> >> >> would try to find something, but if you need some help in this task,
>> please
>> >> >> tell me.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still some
>> >> >>> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are ready
>> for
>> >> >>> the user tests.  Much of it will involve some level of coordinating
>> >> >>> the wireframes with the evaluation plan.  For example, I still need
>> to
>> >> >>> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able to
>> view,
>> >> >>> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation plan.
>> >> >>> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock solid
>> yet,
>> >> >>> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still quite
>> >> >>> welcome.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing protocol
>> during
>> >> >> this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should revise
>> the
>> >> >> wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Other minor things that I thought of are...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> ...the "me" in the comments.  How will we handle this?  Should
>> there
>> >> >>> be no "me" comments when the user begins?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me"
>> comment.
>> >> >> But in the context of the user testing, I think we could assume that
>> the
>> >> >> user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it could
>> be
>> >> >> interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the
>> participant
>> >> >> after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he really
>> >> >> understands it. Do you agree?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view.  Should I
>> do
>> >> >>> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed + each of
>> the
>> >> >>> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually
>> expanded
>> >> >>> and than another set with the description expanded + each of the
>> >> >>> subsections individually expanded.  Perhaps that would be overkill.
>>  I
>> >> >>> hope I didn't lose you with that question.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We may have a version of the page with all the panels collapsed, and
>> >> >> another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these panels, to
>> have a
>> >> >> interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand. Could it
>> be
>> >> >> technically feasible for this mockups' testing version?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page.  Does that just
>> show
>> >> >>> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on that
>> day?
>> >> >>> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text with
>> "Today
>> >> >>> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button
>> should
>> >> >>> be Today's Events instead of Events.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it shows
>> >> >> tomorrow's or the nearest future's events.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the "Exhibition"
>> >> >>> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that.  Shouldn't all they
>> need
>> >> >>> to know be the running time?  Or are they able to download to
>> download
>> >> >>> those items to their hard drive.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll assimilate the
>> >> >> design of this section to the design we have on the artifact's page
>> for the
>> >> >> video and audio panel.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my email!
>>  I'd
>> >> >>> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any thoughts you
>> >> >>> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our evaluation
>> >> >>> plan.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>> Alistair
>> >> >>> _______________________________________________________
>> >> >>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> >> >>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Tona Monjo
>> >> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
>> >> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tona Monjo
>> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
>> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tona Monjo
>> Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
>> http://www.tonamonjo.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Tona Monjo
Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
http://www.tonamonjo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20091124/459a9398/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list