Prepping Mobile Wireframes for User Testing

tona monjo tonamonjo at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 14:27:11 UTC 2009


James or Jess, I've another question: when doing user tests here, in
Barcelona, do we also have to make the user sign the *Contributor License
Agreement*?

Thanks!

Tona





On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com> wrote:

> James, preparing the documentation for tomorrow's test, I wonder if you
> have used any picture of artifact with label and object code. If you
> haven't, I will prepare one.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tona
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alistair,
> >
> > Thanks for your interest! I'm going to do two user testing tomorrow (at
> our 3PM), and I'm printing today the wireframes to prepare it. I think they
> are complete, but if I detect anything or do some change, I'll tell you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tona
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alistair Jones <ajonesolt at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Tona,
> >>
> >> I'm not sure when you will be doing your user testing (perhaps you
> >> have started already?)  I was wondering if you needed anything else in
> >> the User Ready wireframes.  Let me know if I can do anything to help!
> >> See you tonight in the design meeting
> >>
> >> Alistair
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi Alistair,
> >> >
> >> > It would be interesting if you could also work on the
> >> > FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for the
> user
> >> > testing.
> >> >
> >> > We should also have a new version for FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle
> and
> >> > FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work on it
> after
> >> > creating the 3 new artifact pages.
> >> >
> >> > About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version
> currently at
> >> > the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly).
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!!
> >> >
> >> > Tona
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo <tonamonjo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Alistair,
> >> >>
> >> >> Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the wireframes,
> and
> >> >> they really look much better with actual contents.
> >> >>
> >> >> I send you some comments below (in red):
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <ajonesolt at gmail.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi James and Tona and all,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the Lorem
> Ipsum
> >> >>> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design.  Since I
> was
> >> >>> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases to be
> >> >>> safe, so you should see everything there.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new ones are
> >> >> corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says "icon"
> in
> >> >>> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc.  Do we have
> >> >>> icons for those some where?  Should I try to come up with something?
> >> >>
> >> >> We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good idea if
> you
> >> >> would try to find something, but if you need some help in this task,
> please
> >> >> tell me.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still some
> >> >>> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are ready
> for
> >> >>> the user tests.  Much of it will involve some level of coordinating
> >> >>> the wireframes with the evaluation plan.  For example, I still need
> to
> >> >>> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able to
> view,
> >> >>> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation plan.
> >> >>> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock solid
> yet,
> >> >>> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still quite
> >> >>> welcome.
> >> >>
> >> >> I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing protocol
> during
> >> >> this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should revise
> the
> >> >> wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Other minor things that I thought of are...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ...the "me" in the comments.  How will we handle this?  Should there
> >> >>> be no "me" comments when the user begins?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me"
> comment.
> >> >> But in the context of the user testing, I think we could assume that
> the
> >> >> user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it could be
> >> >> interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the
> participant
> >> >> after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he really
> >> >> understands it. Do you agree?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view.  Should I
> do
> >> >>> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed + each of
> the
> >> >>> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually expanded
> >> >>> and than another set with the description expanded + each of the
> >> >>> subsections individually expanded.  Perhaps that would be overkill.
>  I
> >> >>> hope I didn't lose you with that question.
> >> >>
> >> >> We may have a version of the page with all the panels collapsed, and
> >> >> another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these panels, to
> have a
> >> >> interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand. Could it be
> >> >> technically feasible for this mockups' testing version?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page.  Does that just
> show
> >> >>> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on that
> day?
> >> >>> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text with
> "Today
> >> >>> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button should
> >> >>> be Today's Events instead of Events.
> >> >>
> >> >> It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it shows
> >> >> tomorrow's or the nearest future's events.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the "Exhibition"
> >> >>> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that.  Shouldn't all they
> need
> >> >>> to know be the running time?  Or are they able to download to
> download
> >> >>> those items to their hard drive.
> >> >>
> >> >> Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll assimilate the
> >> >> design of this section to the design we have on the artifact's page
> for the
> >> >> video and audio panel.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my email!  I'd
> >> >>> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any thoughts you
> >> >>> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our evaluation
> >> >>> plan.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> Alistair
> >> >>> _______________________________________________________
> >> >>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> >> >>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Tona Monjo
> >> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
> >> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tona Monjo
> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
>
>
>
> --
> Tona Monjo
> Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
> http://www.tonamonjo.com
>



-- 
Tona Monjo
Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
http://www.tonamonjo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20091124/714e5418/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list