follow up review
obara.justin at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 14:29:05 UTC 2009
That does seem to address my comments.
On 2009-11-04, at 3:31 PM, Laurel A. Williams wrote:
> Hi Justin
> If you would like to do a follow up review, I've addressed your
> comments about config.php in
> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-3188. The actual task
> was to remove the SRC_FILE_NAME and MIN_FILE_NAME values from
> config.php and replace with a dynamically created version of these
> file names (which I did in postProcessor.php). While removing those
> values I re-wrote the instructions on how to use the config.php
> file, so your suggestions came in handy.
>>>> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-3326 - create
>>>> config.php file that works for the server deploy
>>> If possible, in config.php, it might be better to have all of the
>>> fields that need to be set, grouped close together. Currently the
>>> sets of information that needs to be configured are separated by a
>>> chunk that says not to touch it.
More information about the fluid-work