Proto-models posted

[Alistair Jones]

>
> It might be an interesting exercise to translate some of the
> conversations we've had back into scenarios for the sake of the
> proto-models, if there's a compelling reason to go back and do that.
> Otherwise, maybe Tona, Alistair, or I could simply sketch out the
> proto-models that our wireframes represent. Thoughts?
>

I think that perhaps it would be best if we created at least one scenario,
especially if so much of the wireframes are built from dialogue with the
McCord.  The scenario could illustrate the rationale behind many design
decisions that I don't know about.  That rationale could be lost by viewing
only wireframes.  Also, this way, once we create the scenario, we would use
that to influence our proto-models, and then we have proto-models that are
free to inform the wireframes, and vice-versa. (instead of wireframes
unilaterally informing proto-models)  This would fulfil the role of that two
way arrow between proto-models and wireframes in Ron's diagram.

I know it kind of sounds like a step backward in a way, but it could be a
nice way to glue everything together, and would not take that much work.
But if somebody wants to veto that, that's fine too, I'm all for keeping the
momentum going. :)

Alistair


>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:06 AM, tona monjo<tonamonjo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Leah,
> >
> > You will find some scenarios for mobile devices here:
> > http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Mobile+scenarios.
> >
> > They display a different structure from the scenarios included on
> >
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Map+tool+overview+and+scenarios
> ,
> > but maybe they can also be useful for creating the proto-models.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tona
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Leah Maestri <leahmaestri at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've managed to fumble some pages into existence on the Interaction
> Model
> >> Ontology page. (Scroll to the very bottom. They show up as children.)
> >>
> >>
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Interaction+Model+Ontology+and+Example+Proto-Model
> >>
> >> Still trying to figure out if this is the best way to visualize the
> >> proto-models so if any of you have suggestions please feel free to
> format as
> >> you wish.
> >>
> >> NOTE: the iPhone wireframe's proto-model hasn't been altered yet, only
> >> because I'm not sure if there's an scenario existing on the wiki
> somewhere.
> >> (Is there?)
> >> James, do you have a scenario for the wireframe? Does one still need to
> be
> >> written?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Lee(bee)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> >> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tona Monjo
> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design
> > http://www.tonamonjo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> > see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090731/30da6456/attachment.htm>