OSDPL: Icons representing content status

Jess Mitchell jess at jessmitchell.com
Mon Jan 26 02:03:31 UTC 2009


Cool stuff!

J

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jess Mitchell
Boston, MA, USA
Project Manager / Fluid Project
jess at jessmitchell.com
/ w / 617.326.7753  / c / 919.599.5378
jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com
http://www.fluidproject.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




On Jan 23, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Jacob Farber wrote:

> Just for kicks, I put up some ideas here:
>
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/download/attachments/5376456/jon.png
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Jonathan Hung <jhung.utoronto at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> Indeed you are correct Justin! Currently the system will ensure that
> any content in those states will be marked as "not reviewed".
>
> The reason why there is a separate "not reviewed" state (instead of
> just leaving it implied by "Draft" "Pending Review" etc) is because
> any user can publish content without having it reviewed by an editor.
>
> All these states can look confusing, but when implemented it works
> well since they're all done automatically and flows in a way you'd
> expect (user testing could prove me wrong though! :).
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Justin <justin.obara at utoronto.ca>  
> wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > You may have mentioned this in one of your other e-mails about the  
> OSDPL but
> > could you please remind me when the "Not reviewed" means. It would  
> seem that
> > "Draft", "Open for Comments", and "Ready for Review" are all in a  
> state of
> > not having been reviewed.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Justin
> > On 23-Jan-09, at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone.
> >>
> >> I'm continuing work on the design pattern workflow on the OSDPL. So
> >> far a design pattern can take any of the following states:
> >>
> >> - Draft
> >> - Open for Comments
> >> - Ready for Review
> >> - Published
> >> - Reviewed
> >> - Not reviewed**
> >>
> >> I'm trying to think of a succinct icon that describes each state,  
> but
> >> I can't think of anything appropriate. Anyone care to make
> >> suggestions?
> >>
> >> Also the phrase "not reviewed" feels awkward. Anyone suggest a  
> better
> >> phrase or term to describe content that has not been reviewed by an
> >> editor?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> - Jonathan.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Jonathan Hung / jhung.utoronto at gmail.com
> >> Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto
> >> Tel: (416) 946-3002
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> >> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jacob Farber
> University of Toronto - ATRC
> Tel: (416) 946-3002
> www.fluidproject.org
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090125/7b890527/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list