OSDPL: Icons representing content status

Eli Cochran, UC Berkeley eli at media.berkeley.edu
Fri Jan 23 22:00:09 UTC 2009


I like what you've done, combined with text and some color that might
work. I'd love to see how small you can make those before they go to
mush.

- Eli


On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Jacob Farber
<jacob.farber.work at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just for kicks, I put up some ideas here:
>
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/download/attachments/5376456/jon.png
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Jonathan Hung <jhung.utoronto at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed you are correct Justin! Currently the system will ensure that
>> any content in those states will be marked as "not reviewed".
>>
>> The reason why there is a separate "not reviewed" state (instead of
>> just leaving it implied by "Draft" "Pending Review" etc) is because
>> any user can publish content without having it reviewed by an editor.
>>
>> All these states can look confusing, but when implemented it works
>> well since they're all done automatically and flows in a way you'd
>> expect (user testing could prove me wrong though! :).
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Justin <justin.obara at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> > Hi Jonathan,
>> >
>> > You may have mentioned this in one of your other e-mails about the OSDPL
>> > but
>> > could you please remind me when the "Not reviewed" means. It would seem
>> > that
>> > "Draft", "Open for Comments", and "Ready for Review" are all in a state
>> > of
>> > not having been reviewed.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Justin
>> > On 23-Jan-09, at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi everyone.
>> >>
>> >> I'm continuing work on the design pattern workflow on the OSDPL. So
>> >> far a design pattern can take any of the following states:
>> >>
>> >> - Draft
>> >> - Open for Comments
>> >> - Ready for Review
>> >> - Published
>> >> - Reviewed
>> >> - Not reviewed**
>> >>
>> >> I'm trying to think of a succinct icon that describes each state, but
>> >> I can't think of anything appropriate. Anyone care to make
>> >> suggestions?
>> >>
>> >> Also the phrase "not reviewed" feels awkward. Anyone suggest a better
>> >> phrase or term to describe content that has not been reviewed by an
>> >> editor?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> - Jonathan.
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> Jonathan Hung / jhung.utoronto at gmail.com
>> >> Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto
>> >> Tel: (416) 946-3002
>> >> _______________________________________________________
>> >> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> >> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
>
>
> --
> Jacob Farber
> University of Toronto - ATRC
> Tel: (416) 946-3002
> www.fluidproject.org
>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
>



More information about the fluid-work mailing list