a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
Thu Jan 8 20:28:32 UTC 2009
On 8-Jan-09, at 3:01 PM, Colin Clark wrote:
> On 7-Jan-09, at 4:59 PM, Anastasia Cheetham wrote:
>> If this checks out, then does that mean that any code that used the
>> "type" parameter to specify where options should go can be updated
>> to not do this? If so, will this change be made for 0.7?
> If there are examples that use the "type" parameter unnecessarily,
> those can be fixed. The only case I can think of is in the image-
> gallery, which I'll go ahead and fix.
> The type parameter is still valid for users who want to change the
> type of a particular component. If there's any documentation that
> specifically says that you must specify a type even when you only
> want to override the subcomponent's options, that's a bug.
Ok, I might just be confused about this (nothing unusual :-)
In Uploader.js, I see
Is this the type of construct that is no longer necessary?
Anastasia Cheetham a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
More information about the fluid-work