Logo vote

Thu Apr 30 18:11:59 UTC 2009

Absolutely yes, the poll is still open!
However, as a clearer decision is becoming more and more obvious,  I think its safe to ask everyone to include any feedback/voting by end of day in your local time zone
All of the relevant feedback will be used to further refine the logo.

Thanks again for all the helpful feedback!
Jacob

From: Jonathan Hung [mailto:jhung.utoronto at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: Jacob Farber
Cc: Nate Angell; fluid-work List
Subject: Re: Logo vote

So does this mean we can still vote? :)

I vote for #2. But I'm not too keen on the fade toward the top-right, but the design is good!

Also I wonder how Bob (the widget doo-dad in the middle) would look if it were tilted slightly like 5 - 10 degrees counter clockwise.

Good stuff Jacob!

---
Jonathan Hung / jhung.utoronto at gmail.com<mailto:jhung.utoronto at gmail.com>
Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto
Tel: (416) 946-3002

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Jacob Farber <jacob.farber at utoronto.ca<mailto:jacob.farber at utoronto.ca>> wrote:

Sorry everyone - I was a bit hasty in closing this.

It should be unlocked at this point.

From: fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org<mailto:fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org> [mailto:fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org<mailto:fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org>] On Behalf Of Jacob Farber
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:18 PM
To: Nate Angell
Cc: fluid-work List
Subject: RE: Logo vote

Thanks for all the feedback!

Please note voting will be turned off in 20 mins.

From: Nate Angell [mailto:nate.angell at rsmart.com<mailto:nate.angell at rsmart.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:42 PM
To: Jacob Farber
Cc: fluid-work List
Subject: Re: Logo vote

I'm a bit of a lurker, so maybe my vote counts less, but I think #2 is the hands-down winner ;)

On Apr 29, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Paul Zablosky wrote:

Given the choices, I'm going to have to vote for Logo 2.  The cogs in Logo 1 do not look like they are going to mesh -- I can almost hear that dreadful sound of a transmission chewing its own innards. (This from a person who keeps the layshaft<http://auto.howstuffworks.com/transmission1.htm> from a 1968 MGB as a desk ornament.)

Coming back to the fluid/droplet metaphor, I rather like the idea of using an image of droplets fusing, each with its own inner cohesion (there's a word from software engineering), but bonding according to natural laws (physics).

Paul

PS: I agree with Antranig about the kerning.

Jacob Farber wrote:

For the sake of expediency (we need to finalize these fairly quickly) I have set up a voting page.

Im sorry if not every piece of feedback has made it into these three choices, but time is pretty short (I've never made a logo in 1.5 days before :P )

Please vote!

http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Infusion+Logo

You need to be logged in to Confluence - when you are, just click the checkbox you like the best.

Hopefully we can put more time+effort into these at a later date.

Thanks again for all the feedback!

Jacob

________________________________

_______________________________________________________

fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org<mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>

To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,

see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org<mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org<mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090430/7e790bba/attachment.htm>