Logo vote

[Nate Angell]

I'm a bit of a lurker, so maybe my vote counts less, but I think #2 is  
the hands-down winner ;)

On Apr 29, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Paul Zablosky wrote:

> Given the choices, I'm going to have to vote for Logo 2.  The cogs  
> in Logo 1 do not look like they are going to mesh -- I can almost  
> hear that dreadful sound of a transmission chewing its own innards.  
> (This from a person who keeps the layshaft from a 1968 MGB as a desk  
> ornament.)
>
> Coming back to the fluid/droplet metaphor, I rather like the idea of  
> using an image of droplets fusing, each with its own inner cohesion  
> (there's a word from software engineering), but bonding according to  
> natural laws (physics).
>
> Paul
>
> PS: I agree with Antranig about the kerning.
>
> Jacob Farber wrote:
>>
>> For the sake of expediency (we need to finalize these fairly  
>> quickly) I have set up a voting page.
>> Im sorry if not every piece of feedback has made it into these  
>> three choices, but time is pretty short (I’ve never made a logo in  
>> 1.5 days before :P )
>>
>> Please vote!
>> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Infusion+Logo
>> You need to be logged in to Confluence – when you are, just click  
>> the checkbox you like the best.
>>
>> Hopefully we can put more time+effort into these at a later date.
>> Thanks again for all the feedback!
>> Jacob
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090429/ad1e9167/attachment.htm>