Component families laid out on the wiki.

Jess Mitchell jess at jessmitchell.com
Mon Sep 15 20:13:02 UTC 2008


Not sure this is quite getting to it, though this is a good start.   
I'm afraid I don't have any recommendations for how to do things  
differently.  Not very helpful, eh?

Jess

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jess Mitchell
Boston, MA, USA
Project Manager / Fluid Project
jess at jessmitchell.com
/ w / 617.326.7753  / c / 919.599.5378
jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com
http://www.fluidproject.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




On Sep 15, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Jonathan Hung wrote:

> Following the discussion on "Component" families, I have modified  
> the layout of the Component page on the wiki to convey this new  
> grouping.
>
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Components
>
> Rather than using a family "name", I just described the  
> functionality being offered as it feels less awkward and reads a  
> little smoother . Example: "Reordering Items" instead of "Reorderer  
> Family".
>
> Not every component is accounted for (inline edit is missing 4  
> "children"), but I'd like to get your feedback on the work so far.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - Jonathan.
>
> ---
> Jonathan Hung / jonathan.hung at utoronto.ca
> University of Toronto - ATRC
> Tel: (416) 946-3002
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list
> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20080915/4a1b46c3/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list