Survey tool for VULab

Michael S Elledge elledge at msu.edu
Mon Sep 8 14:15:42 UTC 2008


No problem...let me know if there are some things about LimeSurvey that 
you particularly like, other than it's being open source, of course.  :^)

Mike

Blake wrote:
> Thanks for this report! I'm reading through it now, and I'll most 
> definiately be looking at how SG runs to see what we can borrow in 
> terms of flow/accessibility etc.
>
> That being said, I think I am going to recommend using LimeSurvey 
> though, as the other options are commercial and they are hosted - so 
> we won't have full access to the source code itself.
>
> LimeSurvey looks to be the best open-source solution, and seems to be 
> the standard out there in terms of open-source options.
>
> We may not even be using a borrowed solution for our surveys, but I 
> feel like we may opt for one to speed things up.
>
> Thanks for the great research Mike!
> - Blake
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Michael S Elledge <elledge at msu.edu 
> <mailto:elledge at msu.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Ron--
>
>     Ohio State University made a thorough review of online survey
>     tools and found that SurveyGizmo had the best accessibility by
>     far. Here is what Ken Petri (from OSU) said recently with respect
>     to an inquiry about Zoomerang:
>
>     See our Survey of Surveys:
>
>     http://wac.osu.edu/workshops/survey_of_surveys/
>
>     Zoomerang leaves much to be desired regarding accessibility.
>
>     Note that our information about LimeSurvey is out of date. The
>     developer got back with us and explained in detail where our critique
>     had problems. We will update this over the next month.
>
>     Some advice for SG: When you create a survey with SurveyGizmo, make
>     the questions headings: First turn off automatic numbering, then, for
>     the question itself, put in HTML that makes the question a heading and
>     give the question element a tabindex of 0, so it can accept keyboard
>     focus via the tab key: <h2 tabindex="0">12. What makes SG so good for
>     accessibility?</h2>. This technique, which is trivial to implement in
>     SG and difficult or impossible in the other tools, helps a lot with
>     accessibility for screen reader users and users who need to use the
>     keyboard only to navigate pages.
>
>     So SG would be my suggestion.  :^)
>
>     Mike
>
>     Blake wrote:
>
>         I'm looking at delicious.com <http://delicious.com>
>         <http://delicious.com> and here is the MOST popular one on there.
>
>
>         http://www.limesurvey.org
>         I think we should try to use something current and maintained
>         as we will be wanting to use some advanced js functionality etc.
>
>         I'm taking a look now, I'll report. ( going to add roadmap
>         jira first ;) )
>
>
>         On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Ron Owston
>         <ROwston at edu.yorku.ca <mailto:ROwston at edu.yorku.ca>
>         <mailto:ROwston at edu.yorku.ca <mailto:ROwston at edu.yorku.ca>>>
>         wrote:
>
>            At the Standup meeting today we discussed replacing the current
>            survey tool in VULab (phpESP) with another open source tool. At
>            York University we use UCCASS
>            <http://www.bigredspark.com/survey.html> which does a
>         fairly good
>
>            job I've found. It uses the  Affero General Public License
>         which
>            may also cause problems. Is anyone familiar with it? Does
>         anyone
>            have other suggestions for open source survey tools?
>            Thanks, Ron  
>            
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         fluid-work mailing list
>         fluid-work at fluidproject.org <mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
>         http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>          
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: elledge.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20080908/b63cc3cc/attachment.vcf>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list