Next iteration of List Reorderer in Announcements posted...
colin.clark at utoronto.ca
Sun Oct 26 14:58:35 UTC 2008
On 26-Oct-08, at 9:53 AM, Clay Fenlason wrote:
> Is there an accessibility reason, perhaps, for why reordering in place
> is the wrong way to go?
I'll let Daphne or others respond to the overall interaction question,
but I don't see any specific accessibility reasons for avoiding
"reorder in place." Indeed, in other implementations of the Reorderer,
such as uPortal 3.1's use of the layout reorderer, we don't use a
separate mode at all. Reorderering is just there when you need it.
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
More information about the fluid-work