Rich text inline editing

Antranig Basman antranig at caret.cam.ac.uk
Wed Nov 12 15:34:24 UTC 2008


Steven Githens wrote:

> > I don't see why you couldn't easily plug FCKEditor in as an
> > alternative. We can walk you through the process if you're interested
> I've been thinking about this too and wanted to vote+=1.  I know TinyMCE
> is better and being used in all the research for next generation Fluid
> and Sakai stuff, but I think we'll definately need it to not be super
> difficult to use this with other Rich Text Editors. ( I think a little
> difficult would be ok ;)    )

We will make it easy to work with everything. 

> In addition to Lovemore, I know at least a few other groups that are
> doing this same thing manually and would probably love to use the Fluid
> one as soon as it's ready.  For any medium timeline deliverable that
> needs to get dropped into Sakai 2.5 or 2.6 and look like the rest of the
> system, there is a strong likelyhood it will need to be able to use FCK.
> 
> Also, I don't how easy it is to swap implementations across the system
> in Moodle (probably a bit easier than Sakai), but their default is
> typically HTMLArea, so I imagine they would need to the ability to use
> that too in order to match the rest of the system.
> 
> Mega cheers,
> Steve



More information about the fluid-work mailing list