jARIA license

David Bolter david.bolter at utoronto.ca
Wed Mar 5 19:43:23 UTC 2008

Thanks Chris,

This sounds like the most reasonable approach to me too :)  (GPL/MIT)

I'm looking forward to working with you.


Chris Hoffman wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 14:01 -0500, Colin Clark wrote:
>> Fluid is *not* licensed under GPL. We're dual licensed as ECL 2 and  
>> BSD. This gives our users a wide range of choices.
> Thanks for the correction. I misread David Bolter's original email at
> the beginning of this thread, and honestly saw too many Gs, Ps and Ls
> and got confused.
>> I think there's a larger question here. If the burgeoning jQuery  
>> accessibility movement ends up choosing to integrate or adapt jARIA  
>> and include it into jQuery UI, are you amenable to this, Chris H.? If  
>> so, it seems like it may simplify things to bring the license in line  
>> with jQuery's license.
> I am amenable--in fact, that's what I want. I'll follow this thread for
> another day or so, just to get some other folks' input, and then will
> most likely change to the GPL/MIT license.
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list
> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

More information about the fluid-work mailing list