Is Inline Edit beta ready?

Eli Cochran eli at media.berkeley.edu
Wed Jun 18 16:32:05 UTC 2008


I've made a minor change which *fixes* both these problems. OK, well  
not completely but it makes it better. All I really did was change the  
tag for the editable element from an h4 to a span. An h4 is a block  
element which by definition is width: 100%.

I changed the styling ever so slightly adding a faint border  
to .invitation.

- Eli

On Jun 18, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Eli Cochran wrote:

> I'm going to play around with this a bit this morning. A good  
> distraction from a tetchy tummy.
>
> - Eli
>
> On Jun 18, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Eli Cochran wrote:
>
>> I agree that the column resizing is annoying but I played around  
>> with the styling and the HTML and I have to say, it's not easy to  
>> fix.
>>
>> The two choices to fix it are:
>> - having the edit box be only as wide as the original text which  
>> makes it more difficult for the user to add more characters to the  
>> field, or to even know that they can add more text than is there.
>> - constraining the widths of the table column on the fly. Now that  
>> might work. It would be a "special case" since an inline editor  
>> wouldn't always be in a table. The bigger issue is that  
>> constraining column widths in tables is notoriously hard to do in a  
>> nice way. Hmm...
>>
>> That's definitely a tough one.
>>
>> - Eli
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 7:35 AM, erin yu wrote:
>>
>>> Two little bugs :)
>>>
>>> 1. I think the yellow highlight should highlight the editable text
>>> only and shouldn't go all the way to the end of the column. This
>>> convention is useful esp. when not the entire text in the column is
>>> editable. I'll open a JIRA for it if everyone agrees.
>>> 2. When you click on the yellow highlight, the subject becomes an
>>> editable text box _and_ at the same time expands the column. As a
>>> results, the other columns to the right of the subject column are
>>> shifted to the right. Will open a JIRA for it.
>>>
>>> Erin
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18-Jun-08, at 10:13 AM, Michelle D'Souza wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> We are planning to cut an 0.4 beta on June 26th. In it we'd like to
>>>> feature both Inline Edit and Pager in preview modes. To accomplish
>>>> this, I would like to switch my attention from Inline Edit to Pager
>>>> even though Inline Edit is still in basic form. Designers, can you
>>>> take a look at Inline Edit and see what you think? Presenters, is
>>>> there enough done of Inline Edit for your presentations?
>>>>
>>>> http://build.fluidproject.org/fluid/sample-code/inline-edit/
>>>> announcements/announcements.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Michelle
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Michelle D'Souza
>>>> Software Developer, Fluid Project
>>>> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
>>>> University of Toronto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> fluid-work mailing list
>>>> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>>> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fluid-work mailing list
>>> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>
>> . . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .                     .
>>
>> Eli Cochran
>> user interaction developer
>> ETS, UC Berkeley
>>
>>
>
> . . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .                     .
>
> Eli Cochran
> user interaction developer
> ETS, UC Berkeley
>
>

. . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .                     .

Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley





More information about the fluid-work mailing list