Table of contents for Fluid user manual
Colin Clark
colin.clark at utoronto.ca
Wed Jun 4 17:07:08 UTC 2008
I also like this approach. Great idea, Paul.
Colin
On 4-Jun-08, at 1:05 PM, Daphne Ogle wrote:
> +1 This sounds like a great structure to meet our goals of easy
> access and the distinction between the kinds of deliverables we are
> offering.
>
> -Daphne
>
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 4:52 PM, Paul Zablosky wrote:
>
>> I agree. We have the "release manual" material, which tracks the
>> releases, and the "other user manual material" which is under
>> constant development. My own feeling is that we should set up a
>> single table of contents to reflect this. The (virtual) user
>> manual would comprise two sections, organized something like this:
>> • Release Manual
>> • Component descriptions
>> • API descriptions
>> • Component-related tutorials
>> • Release notes
>> • Downloading
>> • etc
>> • User Guide to Fluid
>> • UX Toolkit
>> • User Experience material
>> • OSDPL material
>> • VULab material
>> • other exciting stuff
>> We're pretty close to this now. I'd like to have only one ToC,
>> just to give our readers a single starting place for their
>> excursions through our documentation. But I'm interested to hear
>> other's opinions on this.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Daphne Ogle wrote:
>>>
>>> Reading this thread, I keep wondering what other avenues we have
>>> for letting the community know about Fluid UX projects that might
>>> be useful to them (Higher Ed personas, content management use
>>> cases) yet is not part of the release. The release date doesn't
>>> put a stake in the ground for this material as it does with
>>> components, APIs and the such. It is continuously growing and
>>> becoming more refined. So in that sense it doesn't really make
>>> sense for it to be part of a release manual. On the other hand,
>>> these things are a valuable deliverable for the communities. Do
>>> we need a separate jumping off point (perhaps TOC) for UX Projects/
>>> Toolkit and deliverables?
>>>
>>> -Daphne
>>>
>>> On Jun 2, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Paul Zablosky wrote:
>>>
>>>> This whole exercise of creating a virtual user manual has raised
>>>> all sorts of interesting questions. I'm delighted to see these
>>>> things being discussed as the ToC evolves. Is it a release manual
>>>> (our original objective), or a manual for people using any of the
>>>> resources of the Fluid project (something it may be morphing into)?
>>>>
>>>> I'm inclined to let it develop a bit, but keep discussion going
>>>> on important issues, such as how we keep release-specific content
>>>> distinguished from release-independent stuff -- the issue
>>>> Anastasia addressed. We'll need a few guidelines to keep things
>>>> under control. I offer the following for discussion:
>>>> • Content that is associated with the Fluid software releases
>>>> should be readily identifiable and easily found by the release
>>>> consumers. Right now we have it as the first sections of the
>>>> ToC. We should keep it this way until we come up with a more
>>>> logical setup.
>>>> • Annotations should give the user a age without clicking on it.
>>>> We should always keep that in mind when composing or editing them.
>>>> • Section annotations should help the users decide if the
>>>> material in the section is going to be generally of interest to
>>>> them.
>>>> • The ToC should not have any child pages. Pages with manual-
>>>> only content should be attached to a central "Manual" parent
>>>> page, if they have no other logical home.
>>>> • The ToC has now grown to about 2 1/2 scrollable screens in
>>>> size. At some point it may become unwieldy. I have been toying
>>>> with the idea of have cloakable sections but I'm not sure this is
>>>> a good idea. It would mean the user having to click rather than
>>>> scroll.
>>>> What this whole scheme needs is some user testing. Is it doing
>>>> its job of making the Fluid reference material more accessible to
>>>> consumers of the Fluid deliverables? How can we find out? We may
>>>> not be ready for that yet -- we may want to do a few more rounds
>>>> of refinemen hing to keep in mind.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> Colin Clark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Allison,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2-Jun-08, at 5:55 PM, Allison Bloodworth wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the main impetus for adding this section was that we
>>>>>> wanted to share out the results of the Content Management
>>>>>> Research as a way of reporting on the state of UX in the Fluid
>>>>>> communities (which I believe is one of the Fluid deliverables).
>>>>>> After adding this, I realized that the results of the UX
>>>>>> Walkthroughs are also something that we should probably share.
>>>>>> I'm not entirely sure the OSDPL working group belongs there,
>>>>>> but I added it at the last moment to publicize that effort and
>>>>>> maybe it should be deleted. I guess the question is, who is the
>>>>>> audience of the manual and would they find this information
>>>>>> helpful (or conversely does the manual become overwhelming for
>>>>>> most of our audience when it is included)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The nice thing about not freezing our documentation in PDF
>>>>> format is that we can take some time to work out this question
>>>>> and change the table of contents whenever we decide. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Colin
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Colin Clark
>>>>> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
>>>>> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
>>>>> http://fluidproject.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> fluid-work mailing list
>>>> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>>> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>>
>>> Daphne Ogle
>>> Senior Interaction Designer
>>> University of California, Berkeley
>>> Educational Technology Services
>>> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
>>> cell (510)847-0308
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Daphne Ogle
> Senior Interaction Designer
> University of California, Berkeley
> Educational Technology Services
> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
> cell (510)847-0308
>
>
>
---
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list