inline edit specifications question

Daphne Ogle daphne at
Fri Jul 18 23:20:51 UTC 2008

Okay, we've just spent a little more time on the specification page, 
.  It is in better shape and represents what we are planning to build.

It still needs some thought about what should go into a lightweight  
specification page.  It would be great to get some feedback from the  
community about this -- particularly developers.  What do you think  
about what's there now?  Anything else to be added?


On Jul 18, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Allison Bloodworth wrote:

> Hey Justin,
> You are very on top of things! :) That document wasn't quite ready for
> release yet--Daphne and I are still working on it and playing with
> different ideas. We were mostly thinking about the text box case
> yesterday and will add to that document to cover the other contexts
> (hopefully today). I'll let you know when we are done with it and it's
> ready to use as an actual specification.
> Thanks,
> Allison
> On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:57 AM, Justin wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Thanks for posting the inline edit specificatons, Allison,
>> I noticed that you mentioned that the pointer should always be an i-
>> bar after opening an inline editable field. I was wondering if this
>> should be the case for an inline editable field with constrained
>> choice (drop-down menu), because the user cannot type into this  
>> field.
>> Thank You
>> Justin
> Allison Bloodworth
> Senior User Interaction Designer
> Educational Technology Services
> University of California, Berkeley
> (415) 377-8243
> abloodworth at
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list
> fluid-work at

Daphne Ogle
Senior Interaction Designer
University of California, Berkeley
Educational Technology Services
daphne at
cell (510)847-0308

More information about the fluid-work mailing list