Draft report for Mellon Retreat please review

Jutta Treviranus jutta.treviranus at utoronto.ca
Mon Feb 11 18:03:49 UTC 2008


Good suggestions, will do.

Jutta

At 12:57 PM -0500 2/11/08, Colin Clark wrote:
>Hi Jutta,
>
>A few ideas:
>
>* For the Specific Project Goals section, should we use a more 
>present-tense, active tone? For example, "Fluid is creating an 
>architectural framework..." rather than the future tense we are 
>currently using?
>
>* A minor point, but shall we go ahead and refer to the project as 
>"Fluid" in mixed case rather than the upper case we used to use 
>prior to the project getting under way?
>
>* I really like your emphasis on pragmatics in the Marketing and 
>Branding section!
>
>Colin
>
>On 11-Feb-08, at 10:50 AM, Jutta Treviranus wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>Attached is the draft Fluid report for the Mellon retreat. The 
>>suggested length is 4 to 5 pages. The report is 9 pages but I have 
>>not compressed the formatting. Some of the initial stuff is 
>>directly from the proposal to Mellon (with minor corrections). It 
>>is due today.
>>
>>Please send me any edits or additions by 3pm ET today and I will 
>>try to incorporate them.
>>
>>
>>thanks
>>Jutta<DraftFLUID_Project_Report2008.doc>_______________________________________________
>>fluid-work mailing list
>>fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
>---
>Colin Clark
>Technical Lead, Fluid Project
>Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
>http://fluidproject.org



More information about the fluid-work mailing list