Infusing documentation with "Infusion"

Anastasia Cheetham a.cheetham at
Thu Dec 18 16:09:21 UTC 2008

On 18-Dec-08, at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote:

> I would like
> to bring up the opportunity for us to use more of the "Infusion" name.

> "In the header of the file, link to the Javascript files with  
> <script> tags:
> <script type="text/javascript"
> src="fluid-0.6/fluid-components/js/Fluid-all.js"></script>"
> In situations like this, I think we should be using "infusion-0.6".

Jon, these are good thoughts. I agree that we should try to do a  
better job of referring to the Infusion bundle as Infusion, and not as  
Fluid. Page headers, etc. can easily be updated to include Infusion  
where appropriate.

The example you gave is a sample folder name, and was selected because  
currently, our zipped release bundles do extract to a folder with the  
'fluid' name and not 'infusion'. Do we want to consider changing the  
actual name of the bundle files to '' instead of  
''? What about the Fluid-all.js file name?

Good questions...

Anastasia Cheetham                   a.cheetham at
Software Designer, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto

More information about the fluid-work mailing list