Draft description of Fluid Infusion
Daphne Ogle
daphne at media.berkeley.edu
Wed Apr 23 21:44:06 UTC 2008
I'm interested in whether or not other feels the description of
personas and how to create them is useful for the release. I see it
as an educational aspect of the UX Toolkit and in that sense is good
to have in the release. So in that sense perhaps we don't want to
remove personas from the description. Perhaps I'm reading too much
into it -- the expectation that the actual personas will be in the
release -- since we've been working on them.
-Daphne
On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Anastasia Cheetham wrote:
>
> On 23-Apr-08, at 4:41 PM, Daphne Ogle wrote:
>
>> This looks good Anastasia!
>>
>> I think we should remove the personas from the description though.
>> We made good progress on them but they aren't in a state that
>> people outside the process will be able to make much sense of them
>> -- and the information isn't organized at all on the wiki (much of
>> it isn't even up there yet). We've had other priorities trump that
>> work as we've gotten close to the release but hope to have draft
>> personas soon.
>
>
> Daphne, thanks for reviewing the information.
>
> Regarding personas: Currently, the Personas page in the wiki ( http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Personas
> ) is tagged for release - but I notice that it's only a description
> of what a persona is, and why it's useful.
>
> I'll take the mention of personas out of the overview, but this is a
> good opportunity to double-check if that Personals wiki page is
> still intended to be included in the documentation.
>
> --
> Anastasia Cheetham a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
> Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
>
Daphne Ogle
Senior Interaction Designer
University of California, Berkeley
Educational Technology Services
daphne at media.berkeley.edu
cell (510)847-0308
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list