Fluid licensing logistics
sheila.crossey at utoronto.ca
Mon Oct 22 17:45:57 UTC 2007
Here is something else to think about. The short license text embedded in
the actual source code files needs to link to somewhere to get the full text
of the two licenses. I have suggested that this link be back to the LICENSE
file itself. So if you have multiple LICENSE files in multiple trunks, you
create some complexity as you might expect each file to link to the LICENSE
in its own project trunk. Or would you? Maybe there should just be a master
LICENSE file somewhere else to link back to.
If you look at the DOJO licensing documentation at
you'll see that the links to the licenses (Academic Free and BSD links) take
you right to the dual license file in the source code repository and link to
the appropriate license text within it. E.g.
http://trac.dojotoolkit.org/browser/dojo/trunk/LICENSE#L43 (Academic Free)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Scheuhammer" <clown at utoronto.ca>
To: "Sheila Crossey" <sheila.crossey at utoronto.ca>
Cc: <fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Fluid licensing logistics
>> When we cut a branch, that LICENSE file should be copied to the top of
>> the branch so that it is automatically included with a distribution of
>> that branch. I'm pretty sure that happens automatically, but I'll check
>> to make sure.
> In general, making a branch amounts to copying the current contents of the
> trunk to the designated branch. The act of copying will include the
> LICENSE file. Similarly with tagging a set of revisions.
> You wrote:
>> ... LICENSE file that would reside at the top of the trunk of the Fluid
> There is some fussiness here. Currently, the repository has a number of
> directories, each with their own trunk. Each directory is roughly
> equivalent to a "project". For example, currently, there is a
> "components" project/directory, and a "gallery-portlet" project/directory.
> Each has a trunk within the project, and, in the future, any number of
> branches. I also expect that there will be more projects as time goes on.
> I would expect, then, that the LICENSE file be placed at the top of each
> project's trunk. But, that entails multiple copies of the LICENSE, one
> per project, which is somewhat undesirable, but isn't too bad.
> If that were done, then the normal branching and tagging operations would
> work with respect to automatically including the LICENSE file.
> 'Oozy rat in a sanitary zoo'
> - "Bob", W. A. Yankovic -
More information about the fluid-work