colin.clark at utoronto.ca
Mon Aug 13 16:07:00 UTC 2007
Apologies for the delay in responding. This is a very interesting question.
We've done our initial implementation of the Lightbox in Dojo, but are
continuing to compare and evaluate toolkits.
Our next step is to take the impending Reorderer framework
service--which is based on the Lightbox code--and make it easy for
non-Dojo toolkits to be plugged in and compared. This will give us a
common point of functionality with which to evaluate the available range
of toolkits including YUI, JQuery, and Prototype/Scriptaculous. I hope
we'll get to do some of this porting work the Fluid summit in September.
One of the key reasons we chose to go with Dojo initially is that we
have a team of two developers (Simon and David) who are working with the
Dojo community to add accessibility support to the Dijit suite of
widgets for the Dojo 1.0 release. This work is funded by the Mozilla
Foundation and IBM as an extension to our work on Fluid.
Eli Cochran wrote:
> Hi Colin,
> Mara suggested that you were the place to start when asking about JS
> frameworks. I'm curious about what discussions have gone on already
> about JS frameworks both for Sakai and Fluid. I'd like to get the
> history and get into the discussion.
> Here is what I know so far:
> - You folks have been implementing the Lightbox component using Dojo.
> - The Chat tool in Sakai uses jQuery.
> Can you tell me more about your choice to use Dojo. Is it just because
> the Dojo library already has some accessibility hooks, or are there
> other reasons?
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
More information about the fluid-work