[Accessforall] Minutes of Context Description meeting on 2012-06-26

Gottfried Zimmermann (List) zimmermann at accesstechnologiesgroup.com
Tue Jun 26 13:27:55 UTC 2012

The minutes of our meeting are posted at
Description and below my signature in this message.


As discussed, please contribute to the table of context properties here:


Our next meeting will be on Tue, Jul 3, at 12-14 UTC (in lieu of the main
Needs & Preferences working group).







 Prof. Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann

Mobile User Interaction



+Description> 2012-06-26 Meeting on Context Description 

Tue June 26, 12:00-14:00 UTC

12&hour=12&min=00&sec=0&p1=0> Translate to my time zone


This meeting is being held as part of the Raising the Floor Consortium. The
Raising the Floor membership agreement, in particular its IPR policy,
applies to the contents of the meeting.


*	Liddy
*	Andy
*	Gottfried, Christophe
*	Vassilis
*	Kostas
*	Colin
*	Claudia
*	Andres

Collection of existing approaches for context description

What are current practices of describing context information such as:
environment, situation, time, location?

What is the relevant literature?

What research projects can we learn from?

*	UsiXML
*	MyUI

What are relevant standards?

*	(by Christophe Strobbe) RFC 4480: "RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to
the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)":
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4480> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4480 

*	this standards defines elements such as activities (with values such
as away, busy, meal, meeting and tv), mood, place-is (with the values noisy,
ok, quiet, unknown; for video: toobright, ok, dark), privacy (with the
values audio, text, unknown and video), etcetera.
*	Not sure where it is being used

*	(by Christophe Strobbe) RFC 4589: "Location Types Registry":
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4589> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4589] 

*	with locations such as airport, automobile, bicycle, bus, hospital,
hotel, library, office, outdoors, place-of-worship, public, and

*	Schema.org 

*	Maybe for location information?

*	ISO 9241-11 

*	General information on usability?
*	Annex A: Table on user context

*	W3C IndieUI 

*	Events Model & Context Model
*	Proposal will be submitted around AccessForAll3


(by Jim Tobias)

I wonder if WHO's International Classification of Functions is relevant to
this task force: <http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/>

ICF is a recognized categorization of 4 dimensions (BODY FUNCTIONS, BODY
intended to explain the concept of disability in terms of roles and

The last 2 dimensions capture at least some of what we may be looking for;
for example:

*	d3500 Starting a conversation
*	d3501 Sustaining a conversation
*	d3502 Ending a conversation
*	d3503 Conversing with one person
*	d3504 Conversing with many people
*	d3508 Conversation, other specified
*	d3509 Conversation, unspecified

It's not principally technological in its orientation - in fact, it could be
criticized on how it treats the use of technology - but it is the conceptual
framework most used in international disabilities research, and thus has a
certain amount of credibility and familiarity. Even if ICF does not become
our main schema, we might do well to develop at least some parallel
references to it.

Input by Vassilis

First, it is important to share a common understanding of the notion of
context. The attached Table presents a quite common classification of the
types of context proposed by Stefan Poslad. In essence, 6 types are
identified related with the questions: what, who, where, when, how it is
accessed and why it is useful. At a higher level, the Table groups the above
questions into four categories, i.e.: Physical, Human, ICT, Goal.
In accordance with this categorization, we defined a similar subclass
hierarchy for the Condition class of the User Profile Ontology (
http://wiki.gpii.net/index.php/File:Conditions_v4.png - more details:

With respect to context description per se, a recent review paper on context
modeling (and reasoning) is the following:
If you do not have access via the above link, you may find a pre-print
version here:
In summary, the major modeling approaches are: key-value models, markup
models, domain-focused models, object-role based models, ontology-based
models and hybrid context models.

For the ontology-based model, notable are the SOUPA ontologies (Standard
Ontologies for Ubiquitous and Pervasive Applications -
http://cobra.umbc.edu/ont/soupa-ont.tar.gz) - although quite old - which may
be considered as an upper-ontology framework for developing context-aware

Next steps

HDM: Create a table in the GPII Wiki for collecting context-describing
properties from various standards, technologies and projects.

*	Colums: 

*	Property global name (URI, ending with local name)
*	Value space
*	Default value
*	English description
*	Reference (standard and property local name, project)
*	Is Core?
*	(For registry entry) Description in other languages
*	(For registry entry) Localized labels for presentation to user

*	Major sections for: 

*	Environment
*	Situation
*	Time
*	Location

Action Items

Fill table at  <http://wiki.gpii.net/index.php/Context_Properties>
http://wiki.gpii.net/index.php/Context_Properties with information from
other projects and standards:

*	Vassilis: User Profile Ontology, paper on context modeling, SOUPA
*	Claudia: ISO 9241-11 Annex A
*	Christophe: RFCs 4589 & 4480
*	Andy: Schema.org & ISO/IEC 24751
*	Gottfried: Contact somebody from MyUI
*	Andres: UsiXML & ISO/IEC 24756
*	Gottfried: WHO ICF, ISO/IEC 24752

See also: ISO 8601, XML Schema Definition - Part 2

Future Meetings

Tue Jul 3, 12-14 UTC = 14-16 CET

Future Agenda Items


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/accessforall/attachments/20120626/2a6d0228/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Accessforall mailing list