[Accessforall] [SP2] Conditional preferences
andyheath at axelrod.plus.com
Fri Aug 10 15:53:44 UTC 2012
Colin - note the first item here
> Hi all,
> On 2012-08-06, at 3:18 PM, Andy Heath wrote:
>> axelrod:andy - I haven't followed every twist and turn in this
>> thread so I'm guessing and filling in the gaps, possibly wrongly,
>> but what I'm seeing here is a debate about whether preferences
>> should only be described in low level terms or whether there should be some notion of needs (or something like that, that is at a higher level) in there somewhere. Am I interpreting this discussion reasonably ?
> While it may just be a question of terminology, I don't think making a distinction between preferences and needs is a good idea--we've always taken the approach that AccessForAll doesn't differentiate in any technical way between the user's needs, wants, tastes, etc. They're all important.
> The goal of this particular discussion, in my mind, is fairly focused: to brainstorm is a mechanism by which users can express conditional needs and preferences in a semantic and extensible way, rather than a with a fixed set of opaque, low-level boolean operators.
> Colin Clark
> Lead Software Architect,
> Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD University
More information about the Accessforall